Why did Trump win? The answer is simple: he resonated with voters. He connected on a fundamental level, addressing their needs even before they voiced them. By identifying core issues affecting Americans and the world, he laid out clear, actionable paths for tackling them.

In contrast, Harris focused her campaign on painting Trump as a threat to democracy, labeling him with terms like “Hitler,” “Nazi,” and “fascist.” Yet she offered no substantial roadmap to address the real concerns of Americans and the global community. Meanwhile, her party sought to weaponize the justice system to neutralize Trump—some might argue, through means obscured from public scrutiny, only reported fleetingly in the media. Consider how differently a hypothetical assassination attempt on Harris would be covered: exhaustive reports, widespread outrage. Yet, alleged assassination plots against Trump, potentially involving encrypted foreign-based apps, have remained shrouded in silence. The media, it seemed, was willing to turn a blind eye.

When Harris stumbled in interviews, edits smoothed over her missteps. She avoided independent platforms, sidestepping unfiltered conversations, like with Joe Rogan, where any faltering couldn’t be concealed. And when she faced a lone Republican interviewer to create a semblance of balance, she performed poorly.

Americans had a stark choice: a candidate with a track record versus one marked by failures, censorship versus freedom, stability versus uncertainty. They had to choose between raising their children with their own values or watching as schools dictated new narratives, telling children they could reject parental guidance and redefine their identities without family input. They saw one candidate focused on solutions and another whose campaign hinged on undermining the opposition.

The electorate didn’t buy it. Recognizing that the country was veering off course, they made a choice rooted in common sense. They opted for the candidate who voiced real concerns and who promised the foundational virtues of a functioning society. They were discerning; they were wise.

For Democrats to compete, they needed to acknowledge genuine issues, admit their shortcomings, and pledge strong leadership to correct them. But their refusal to do so only cemented the outcome: a decisive Trump victory.

Now, global markets, world leaders, and international businesses look forward with cautious optimism, anticipating an era of stability and prosperity under Trump’s renewed leadership.